PhytoMycology
For Reviewers
Reviewer guidance for rigorous, constructive, and ethical peer review.Overview
PhytoMycology is committed to advancing open science and maintaining the integrity of the scientific record. Peer review is a cornerstone of this process.
Reviewers play a critical role in ensuring high-quality, reliable, and ethical scientific communication.
Purpose of Peer Review
- Assess whether the manuscript advances understanding in plant-fungus biology, mycology, or related fields.
- Evaluate whether the work is of broad interest to the scientific community.
- Check whether evidence is sufficient to support the conclusions.
- Assess whether data are technically sound and reproducible.
Reviewer Responsibilities
- Accept assignments only when they have the necessary expertise.
- Provide constructive, considerate, and detailed feedback.
- Respond promptly and maintain communication throughout the review process.
- Uphold professional and ethical standards.
- Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript and review process.
COPE Guidelines
Reviewers are encouraged to follow the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Review:
Benefits for Reviewers
- Personalized reviewer certificates recognizing contributions.
- Eligibility for the journal's Outstanding Reviewer Awards.
- Opportunity to create a profile on Publons linked with ORCID.
- Recognition for supporting rigorous scientific peer review.
Reviewer Board
PhytoMycology maintains a Reviewer Board of experienced reviewers to enhance the speed and quality of peer review.
- Members should complete at least one manuscript review per year.
- Members should recommend alternative reviewers when unable to review.
- Members maintain the same ethical standards as regular reviewers.
- Reviewer Board members may receive certificates and public acknowledgement.